Recently, I've posted on Zaid Ibrahim's take on conversion here:
Zaid: Crackdown on conversions the way out of ‘Allah’ impasse
Today, I would like to expand a little more on the subject of religious conversion.
The chart above is taken from
Buddhanet.net, which shows number of adherents in terms of percentage. The chart below presents the estimated absolute numbers.
Both Christianity & Islam are the world's largest religion, in that order. Adherents from both claims that their respective religion has been growing in numbers. I don't doubt it, since the world population is expanding, it's natural. But there's another important factor which has contributed to the growth, which is
conversion through proselytisation.
Conversion
In light of the recent controversy surrounding the restriction of non-Muslims to use the word "Allah" which is one of the 35 words (or more perhaps?) in the list, it is imperative that we get to the root cause instead of the symptom.
As mentioned in Zaid's article, the root cause has always been conversion & proselytisation, which he suggested to be made illegal, and to which I very much agree.
Firstly, banning words will not solve the problem. Because the problem did not arise from words.
Secondly, even if the ban is lifted, it still would not solve the problem. Because the problem is not with the freedom to use those words.
We have to first ask why was this restriction implemented in the first place? Conversion.
Both would not agree to this because both wants to continue with proselytisation. And each wants to have the advantage, the upper hand... the higher ground. Which is why nobody seems to be interested to comment on Zaid's article.
This is what makes Malaysians the greatest
hypocrites in the world... they would rather focus and debate on the religious scripts, history, language, who did what first, etc... chasing their own tails.
Apparently, this is not a new issue but dates back to the 80s...
MALAYSIAN BISHOPS RESPOND TO RESTRICTIONS ON BIBLES, ´SENSITIVE WORDS´ ISSUE
The bishops of Malaysia, responding to an attempt by the government
to prohibit Christians from using certain words deemed sensitive to
Muslims, say Christians have a right to use them all.
"Our
Catholic bishops have taken up this matter and our stand is that we have
the right to use all 16 words," said a report issued June 14 to
Catholics by the Catholic Research Center here.
The report also
listed incidents since a 1981 gazette notification banning the Alkitab
(Indonesian-language Bible). This and subsequent events, it said, form a
"concerted plan to deprive Christians of their rights to practice their
faith freely, as guaranteed in our Constitution."
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian language) and Bahasa Malaysia are similar.
After correspondence between Archbishop Soter Fernandez of Kuala
Lumpur and the Home Affairs Ministry, the banned words were reduced to
four.
"However, we are still adamant, and insist that we guard
our right to pray and use whatever words we have in the Alkitab," the
report said.
According to the report, Catholic Sabah, newspaper
of Kota Kinabalu diocese in East Malaysia, received a letter in February
from the Home Affairs Ministry prohibiting use of certain Arabic words
in Christian publications.
Officials enclosed alternative words for Christians, as follows:
Prohibited words Alternative
1. Al-Kitab (Bible) Baibel
2. Allah (God) Tuhan
3. Firman (say) Berkata
4. Rasul (messenger) Utusan
5. Syariat (teachings) Ajaran
6. Imam (believe) Percaya
7. Kaabah Tidak ada gantian
8. Ibadah (worship) Amalan
9. Injil Baibel
10. Baitullah Tidak ada gantian
11. Wahyu (revelation) Revelasi
12. Nabi (prophet) Prophet
13. Syukur (praise) Terima Kasih
14. Zikir (remembrance) Mengingat/menvebu
15. Solat (pray) Sembahyang
16. Doa (implore) Memohon
The 1981 ruling stated: "The printing, publication, sale, issue,
circulation or possession of the Alkitab in Indonesian is prohibited, as
it is considered prejudicial to the national interest and security of
the Federation."
In 1982, the Council of Churches in Malaysia (CCM) wrote to Prime Minister Mahathir Mohamad, asking him to lift the ban.
The CCM said it "denies Bahasa Malaysia-speaking Christians their
fundamental right of practicing their religion, since the Alkitab is the
only version of the Holy Bible available to them for their daily
devotions and public worship."
The letter and request for a
meeting received no response, but the government amended the
notification to say, "The above prohibition shall not apply to
possession or use in churches of such publication professing the
Christian religion throughout Malaysia."
This, the report says,
meant the Alkitab and Perjanjian Baru (Indonesian-language New
Testament) may only be used in Christian church buildings.
Possession, use or distribution in homes, shops or any other place would thus be illegal and liable to punishment.
CCM representatives, including then-Auxiliary Bishop Anthony
Selvanayagam of Kuala Lumpur and Jesuit Father Paul Tan, Catholic
Research Center director, met the day following the 1982 amendment.
Then-Deputy Prime Minister and Home Affairs Minister Musa Hitam did
not attend, but Datuk Rozhan Kuntom, meeting chairperson, said Musa
Hitam would lift the ban, on condition that the Alkitab not be
circulated among Muslims.
"As stated, according to the provision
in the amended order," the report said, "Christians (were) not even
allowed to buy their Alkitab from shops, nor allowed to possess their
personal copies in their homes."
Church leaders met with Home
Ministry officials in 1982 to discuss the amended order, and in 1983
several of them, including retired Archbishop Dominic Vendargan of Kuala
Lumpur, signed a memorandum regarding the Bible in Bahasa Malaysia, the
Alkitab and related matters.
"Christ-ians are in fact unable to
purchase and therefore use the Alkitab in the performance of their
religious exercise, due to the prohibition of their sale throughout
Malaysia," the memorandum said.
"More and more of us Christians
are using Bahasa Malaysia in our daily devotions and in our Church
services, but are greatly disturbed and distressed because of this
constraint placed upon us by the respective ban."
"It is almost two years now that Christians have not been able to purchase the Alkitab locally," they wrote.
In 1984, the Christian Book Center in Sibu City, Sarawak, East
Malaysia, received a letter informing them that copies of the Alkitab
and Perjanjian Baru ordered by them would be destroyed.
Christian leaders in Kuala Lumpur urged Musa Hitam to stop the
destruction of Christian Scriptures, saying "the Christian Community in
Malaysia regards this as a sacrilege."
After a letter was sent
by Archbishop Fernandez and other Church leaders, a meeting was held
with Deputy Home Affairs Minister Kassim, who decided:
1. The
Alkitab copies held in Sibu customs would not be destroyed, but
Perjanjian Baru copies held in Johor customs would be returned to
Singapore.
2. The government would allow Christian leaders to
appoint agencies importing the Alkitab, provided the government was
informed.
3. The list of words such as "Allah," forbidden to non-Muslims, would be compiled and given Christians.
After further meetings, 10 outlets throughout Malaysia were authorized to buy the Alkitab and Perjanjian Baru from Indonesia.
But, the report says, the agreement did not filter down to minor officials.
In 1984, 450 copies of the Alkitab, 200 copies of the Perjanjian Baru
and 1,860 other Christian books were confiscated in Sabah.
Kuala Lumpur Church leaders again protested to Home Affairs.
"And so, as far as the importation and distribution of the Alkitab and
Perjanjian Baru is concerned, where do we stand? Only 10 authorized
´agencies´ appointed by Christian Churches are permitted to import
them," the report said.
- SOURCE (It's a Catholic site by the way...)
I think it is common knowledge that both Christians & Muslims have been very active, if not aggressive, in their proselytisation efforts. However, in Malaysia, it is illegal to proselytise to Muslims, but not the other way round. In fact, as I've highlighted before in previous posts, the rights of Muslims (and the converts) reign supreme over other religions.
So, if both Islam & Christianity is expanding, then which religions are declining? My guess would be the Buddhists, Taoists, Hindus, and other minority religions.
Respect
Why are some people so eager to convert others to their religion? Is it because they think they are answering a higher calling, and made it their duty to do so? Or perhaps, deep down, it is actually a lack of respect towards other religions?
And nobody does it with more zeal and passion than some new converts, whom in their warped sense of logic, feel that it is their duty to ridicule & insult their own community's traditions, culture & religion, often to the delight and amusement of their new found "brothers"... in the likes of Ridhuan Tee, Ann Wan Seng, et al. Ask yourselves, is that the right thing to do? Why do they hate their own so much?
It is no wonder that there are so many cases of body snatching for Muslim burial, child conversions and custody issues. They feel that it is their duty, and right, to claim the body for an Islamic burial despite the protests from the family members of different faith, causing untold misery and sadness to the family. So, much for compassion.
On the other side, we have the evangelist Christians, born again Christians, or other smaller denominations like Jehovah's Witness, etc. building a vast network of members and churches within the country and without. You will hardly find a Christian family who have family members from different faiths. If a member converts, they will make it their duty to convert the whole family and their relatives as well.
Why? Because they think that it is their divine duty to "save" you. Because they think that your religion is false, fake, and you will be condemned to eternal hell. So much for respect.
The fact is, there is no freedom in religion. On one hand, they demand freedom, on the other, they restrict freedom. Humans can't deal with freedom of religion.
Death
Death is often the main motivation and factor that drives a religious conversions & proselytisation. Because it is the one thing that humans fear the most. Death. The more important teachings are forgotten or neglected. Adherents are more concerned about what happens to them after death, rather than the present. And it is because of this fear & uncertainty that drives humans to seek refuge in religions. Religions that promises forgiveness for all sins, an eternal life and a wonderful place specially just for them, will attract the most followers.
Why do we see so much negative issues in religion these days? So many bad things are done in the name of religion. A religion is judged by the actions of their followers. When religion is exploited, you will see the terrible things done which reflects negatively on that religion.
We won't see the true virtues and values of religions in politics, in the news, in wars, rallies, protests, conflicts, etc. We don't see it in powerful politicians, the rich and powerful, big corporations. Instead, we see the goodness in our everyday lives, on a personal level, in the community level. We see acts of kindness when someone offers a seat to and elder, care for abandoned animals, rendering help to the less fortunate, across race and religions.
That, my friends, is how religions are meant to work, on a personal level. Providing guidance to do the right thing, to know right from wrong. It's what you do with what you already have, that is important. It's the intention that's important, not the amount.
So are the Buddhists worried about death? Whether we end up in heaven or hell? I think not...
Like they say... go to heaven for the climate, hell for the company... :)
