Bersih 4.0

It was certainly an interesting Merdeka weekend... for some. Evidently, those who attended Bersih enjoyed themselves, patting each others' back for fighting for Free & Fair Elections? or was it for Democracy? or... where's the damn list again? Nevermind, I doubt many actually remember the points on that list? It's was all about bringing down the Prime Minister!

Entertainment provided

They came....

They marched, sang & danced...

Hmmm, that guy's yellow T-Shirt looks kinda plain doesn't it?

They ate...

They slept...

under the scorching tropical sun...

Anyway, in case anyone missed the glaring demographic composition, I've not seen so many middle-class Chinese on the streets of Kuala Lumpur since... well, since, you know, ever.

It's nice to see them so passionate about their cause. Let's hope they've accomplished whatever they set out to do.

Although celebrating Merdeka Day like this is not my thing, I suppose that's what democracy is about. At least they were allowed to do their thing peacefully. I think the authorities handled things rather well this time and the attendees were well-behaved as well.

A few personal obervations from this Bersih 4.0 rally:

1. More than 80% comprised of Chinese.
2. Many who attended wondered why there were so few Malays. Perhaps, they should ask the organisers for the reason.
3. Despite the many reasons given, perhaps the Malays simply did not share the same sentiments as their Chinese brethen. Ok, ok, actually, they just did not feel like attending a DAP rally.
4. From the turnout, we can safely assume that among the opposition parties, DAP has the Chinese in their pocket, PAS has the majority Malay and PKR has very little. Makes you wonder how PKR ended up with the MB's post.
5. DAP has yet again, managed to make the Chinese suffer fools knowing full well that the Malays would not be there in great numbers. 
6. An important point that many chose not to highlight is the fact that, the reason the authorities allowed the rally to proceed peacefully, is because they do not see the Chinese as a threat to the government.
7. In Malaysia, the people do not get to choose the Prime Minister, only the party.
8. And most importantly, the Chinese are actually a well-behaved lot, I'm proud to say. 

The worries, concerns and insecurities felt by the Chinese community are shared by all communities in Malaysia. Who doesn't want a better future for their children? Just do not let yourselves be used especially by those with vested interests.

For instance, some politicians keep drumming into the people that the country is going broke, but at the same time, increasing their own salaries and perks. On one hand, they pretend to emphatise, while on the other, doing little to help.

Crime: Choo Gaik Yap Kidnap, Rape & Murder - Suspect sentenced to death

An update on this 9-year-old case. Justice sure takes it's time...

Earlier post in 2013: http://year1malaysia.blogspot.com/2013/06/crime-choo-gaik-yap-kidnap-rape-murder.html

Earlier post in 2014: http://year1malaysia.blogspot.com/2014/10/crime-choo-gaik-yap-kidnap-rape-murder.html

Businessman sentenced to death for 2006 murder

ALOR SETAR: A 34-year old businessman, Shahril Jaafar was sentenced to death this Sunday for the 2006 murder of Chee Gaik Yap.

Shahril remained calm when the judgement was delivered by Judicial Commissioner Datuk Mohd Zaki Abdul Wahab.

Mohd Zaki said the defence failed to raised reasonable doubt in the case.

"I have no choice but to sentence you with the death penalty, the only punishment as stipulated in Section 302 of the Penal Code," he said.

Chee Gaik Yap

Chee, a Universiti Utara Malaysia graduate, was raped and her body dumped at the housing estate after being abducted while she was jogging in the neighbourhood.

She was believed to have been tailed by her assailant while jogging in the neighbourhood.

The public gallery was packed with friends and families of the victims and accused, as well as pressmen.

Shahril was charged with the murder of marketing executive Chee, 25, near the Cinta Sayang Club in Taman Ria Jaya, Sungai Petani, between 5.30pm Jan 14 and 3.05am Jan 15, 2006.

On June 25, 2013, the Alor Setar High Court acquitted and discharged Shahril from a charge of murdering Chee after finding that the prosecution had failed to prove a prima facie case.

However on Oct 13 last year, a Court of Appeal panel led by Justice Linton Albert, unanimously set aside the High Court’s decision.

The case was re-mentioned on Oct 19 at Alor Setar High Court, with the prosecution team led by Kedah prosecution unit head Salim Soib while Shahril was represented by Shamsul Sulaiman.

Source: http://www.thestar.com.my/News/Nation/2015/08/09/businessman-death-marketing/

The High Income MPs

Congratulations to our MPs whom just recently gave themselves an awesome pay hike which was passed in Parliament without a single objection. I suppose it was expected since the recent Selangor ADUN's massive pay hike not long ago. So much for austerity...

Since many swear by meritocracy and attracting talent with higher pay,  I wonder if finally, we will we be able to attract better quality people to serve us. Hahahaha... nah... that was a joke. Anyway, there are many who thinks they deserve the salary & allowance increments, which will more than double the current cost to the government. But hey, who are we to say otherwise...

---

Published: Saturday April 11, 2015 MYT 12:00:00 AM
Updated: Saturday April 11, 2015 MYT 12:27:28 PM

MPs give themselves a big raise 

PARLIAMENTARIANS have passed a Bill to raise their allowance from RM6,508 to RM16,000, a 146% jump.

The Members of Parliament (Remuneration) (Amendment) Bill was initially deferred for its second reading in last November after lawmakers sought to review the quantum of increase.

On Nov 28, MPs from both sides of the political divide agreed to relook the revision that will increase the allowance from RM6,508 to RM11,000.

The Bill, passed by the House yesterday without any objections, will also see the allowances for Senators increased from RM7,000 to RM11,000.

The allowance for the Senate president and the Dewan Rakyat Speaker was also raised from RM20,000 to RM31,000, while their respective deputies will see theirs revised to RM22,000, up from the initial proposal of RM16,000.

Minister in the Prime Minister’s Department Datuk Seri Shahidan Kassim said the new allowances would see the cost to the Government increasing from RM14.75mil to RM31.97mil a year.

MPs’ salaries have been revised in 1992, 1997, 2001, 2002 and 2005.

In the 2005 review, their basic pay was increased from RM5,916.90 (in 2002) to RM6,508.59, which is not inclusive of other benefits such as a RM1,200 driver’s allowance.

- http://www.thestar.com.my/News/Nation/2015/04/11/MPs-give-themselves-a-big-raise-Bill-passed-sees-increase-of-allowance-from-RM6508-to-RM16000/

GST

This is a brief update on current issues making their rounds in the media.

GST (Goods and Services Tax)

GST has started.… Happy GST-ing!!! Well, the bottom line is, any form of tax is bad for consumers but good for the government. And it is really pointless comparing and scrutinizing the prices of every single purchase you make. Prices have been increasing due to rising costs compounded with inflation.

The government would have less problems and controversy if the rate is lower, say at 2%-3%, and minimal exemptions, which will create less shock to the system and less problems for everyone.

It is unrealistic to expect prices to fall after GST. Which is why I find it extremely patronizing and childish of the government & businesses for engaging in all the publicity exhorting absorbing GST or lower prices.

Anyway, things will cool down in a couple of months and the people will adjust to this new tax.

But the question remains, to pay or not to pay the "Service Charge" at the restaurants?

- Don’t pay extra charge if unhappy with service

Hudud

Realistically, if the majority of Malays & Muslims want it, it will be implemented regardless of political affiliations. Many seem to forget that Islamic Laws are already enforced in Malaysia in the form of Shariah Laws applicable to Muslims but not for non-Muslims. Like it or not, Malaysia is more Islamised today than it was 50 years ago. The non-Muslims should really try to face reality and take a less confrontational approach. Also, the process of passing laws in the country is quite straightforward through voting in Parliament. If it gets enough votes, the bill gets passed and becomes law. Simple.

Anyway, I don't understand what the fuss is about, especially the hysterical reaction that DAP put up against PAS. It was after all, the DAP who asked the non-Muslims to support PAS. And now that PAS proposes the Hudud Bill, DAP blames he PAS President, UMNO, even MCA? Really?

Maintenance

Selangor roads are the worst! Okay, to be fair, most roads in the country are pretty shitty, but those in Selangor really are terrible. The same goes for other services such as rubbish collection, drain cleaning, trees and parks maintenance, etc. It is an absolute disgrace! What is happening before our eyes is a breakdown in management leading to dismal performance, efficiency and responsibility. And the result? Floods, potholes, and dengue outbreak.

Problem: Selangor still tops dengue cases in the country

Action: 87 developers in Selangor to be charged

Somehow, I don't think there will be any improvements anytime soon.

Politics

Well, it's a mess. Just sit back and enjoy the 'Animal Farm' because the people really don't have any say or control over political parties and the politicians. Following the political news is really tiring. Anyway,  I think the people will slowly come to realize who really has the upper hand. Those you put in power actually do not feel beholden to you.They actually have power over you.

Lee Kuan Yew's view on Malaysia

I think Lee Kuan Yew's observation on Malaysia was indeed quite accurate.

Anyway, had Singapore remained in Malaysia, I doubt he could have done what he did and achieved the same results for Singapore, or for Malaysia.

---

2015-03-25 13:29

Translated by SOONG PHUI JEE
Sin Chew Daily

Singapore's founding father Lee Kuan Yew, who had spent a lifetime being the architect of Singapore's prosperity, has died. In addition to building and fostering Singapore, Lee was also very much concerned about Malaysia and had always advocated the Malaysian Malaysia concept. In his book One Man's View of the World, he wrote that people of his generation have always believed that Singapore and Malaya should exist as one, adding that the British separated us after the war and made us colonies, but we fought to merge.

Singapore and Malaya finally merged in 1963, but racial disputes continued, even resulted in clashes. It forced Lee to declare in tears the withdrawal of Singapore from the Federation of Malaysia on August 9, 1965.

Lee regretted the painful history. He said that if Tunku Abdul Rahman was firm enough to soothe the radicals, build a multiracial Malaysia, and let the Chinese and Indians share power in the police, army and administrative agencies, Malaysia will be more prosperous and fair than it is today. "Much of what has been achieved in Singapore could have been replicated throughout Malaysia. Both countries would have been better off," he added.

However, there is no "if" in history and everything is now unalterable fact. Lee had played an important role and should bear a certain degree of historical responsibility in the withdrawal of Singapore from the Federation of Malaysia. History will have a fair judgement on this point.
As a leader closely related to Malaysia, Lee had always observed the development of Malaysia even after the withdrawal of Singapore from the Federation of Malaysia, and expressed his views.  

In his book One Man's View of the World, he commented on Malaysia:

• The population structure of Malaysia will make it more difficult to shake Malay supremacy. Many Chinese and Indians choose to leave Malaysia and emigrate to other countries.
• Race-based policies is putting Malaysia at a disadvantage. It is voluntarily shrinking the talent pool needed to build the kind of society that makes use of talent from all races. They are prepared to lose that talent in order to maintain the dominance of one race.
• Eventually, the Chinese and Indians will exert little influence at the polling booths. When that day comes, with no votes to bargain with, the Chinese and Indians cannot hope to bring about a fair and equal society for themselves.

In the eyes of Lee, the "1Malaysia" slogan had not lived up to the excitement it created. He opined that Malaysians hoping that Barisan Nasional’s 1Malaysia concept can usher in a new era for race relations may be unrealistic, but those counting on the Opposition to do the same are not very much less so, as the chance of the opposition coming to power in the near future was a very long shot. Even if it comes to power, it will be almost impossible for the PR to abolish Malay supremacy.

Describing it as "an opportunistic ad-hoc group", Lee criticised the PR for not holding together by even a vaguely coherent set of ideas but by a common desire to unseat the government. He said that as long as PR does not actually occupy Putrajaya and does not have to implement multiracial policies, some semblance of unity can be maintained within the pact. "When it comes to the crunch, however, PR will not be able to do away with Malay supremacy. The moment the bluff is called and it is handed full power to push ahead, it will either be torn apart from within or be paralysed by indecision.

"If it attempts to move in any meaningful way, PAS, a Malay-Muslim party that will hold if not a majority of seats within the coalition, then at least a significant enough share to give it veto power, would block action in an instant.

"In doing so, PAS would be responding to the same electoral pressures that Umno faces from the Malay ground, Lee said.

He said that he regarded the Malays as the camp that will always control the majority seats of the Parliament and no matter which political party replaces Umno, and becomes the main party representing Malay interests, its style will not be far from Umno's.

Many people might not agree with the above comments of Lee but his observation was indeed unique, particularly his comments on PAS, which was very sharp and worthy of pondering and vigilance!

- http://www.mysinchew.com/node/107272?tid=12

Lemon Law

It's high time there are better laws to protect consumers. On one hand, Malaysia aspires to be a developed nation but on the other hand, not enough emphasis is placed on quality of services and products. With better consumer laws, businesses and manufacturers would be compelled to think about the level of quality of their services and products.

I've noticed that the current generation of consumers are more demanding. They have more choices and they have more purchasing power. In this time and age, it is absolutely unacceptable for consumers being given the shorter end of the stick. Most times, they have to go against established brands and multi-national companies just to protect their rights.

The sectors that should be better regulated in terms of consumer rights is Property & Automobile, both which happens to constitute the largest commitment by consumers. The existing laws for both sectors are far from adequate. In fact, it is the businesses which are better protected than consumers!

Thanks to the internet & various forums as well as social media, big businesses can no longer hide or ignore complaints & issues as easily.

---

Protecting our interests Consumer group calls on government to implement ‘Lemon Law’

THE National Consumer Complaints Centre (NCCC) has urged the Government to make laws to help consumers seek prompt settlement in disputes over defective products.

“It is time the Government introduces what is known as a ‘lemon law’ for motor vehicles and other product purchases, to protect consumers,” said NCCC director Ratna Devi Nadarajan.

Ratna said the Consumer Association of Singapore described it as consumer laws providing a statutory right of action against a trader or manufacturer involving the sale of defective goods, in situations where there has been a failure to comply with the warranty in a purchase contract.

Such laws obligate sellers to repair, replace, refund or reduce the prices of defective goods.

Singapore introduced the lemon law on Sept 1, 2012, which was added to the Consumer Protection (Fair Trading) Act and with related amendments to the Hire Purchase Act and Road Traffic Act.

This makes it easier for consumers to have their day in court without being given the runaround.

“Malaysians are often left with a sour taste (hence the reference to lemons) after paying for a product or service that is defective or not up to standard, especially more so now against the backdrop of rising costs of living.

“For example in renovation works, the grouse is usually poor workmanship or a hold-up in completion,” said Ratna.

“Most people may not understand the nature of lemon laws, but basically the laws will help consumers become better informed, enabling them to make trade-offs based on quality and price.

“This can signal to the market that product standards are of importance.

Read more here: http://www.thestar.com.my/News/Community/2014/12/18/Protecting-our-interests-Consumer-group-calls-on-government-to-implement-Lemon-Law/

It's all the Chinese's fault!

When all else fails, just blame the Chinese.

That's the essence of Malaysian politics. I'm glad that these groups are vocal with their demands. At least now, the Chinese can't really be blamed for voting the way they did, nor being questioned with "Apa lagi China Mau?"...

Lay out all the cards on the table. Let everyone see and make their choices.

Don't say one thing but do another! I hope the rules are clearly spelled out once and for all... hopefully in my lifetime.

---

Can Umno steer BN in the right direction?

by Khoo Kay Peng

Umno is making a big mistake if it caves in to the demands of Perkasa, a coalition of Malay rights groups.

In the run up to the party’s recent annual general assembly, Perkasa leaders were busy drawing up memorandums calling for the abolition of vernacular schools (especially Chinese vernacular schools), allowing only Bumiputeras to be exempted from repaying their National Higher Education Fund (PTPTN) loan schemes and others.

Once again, the group has chosen to target the Chinese community to bolster its credentials as an ethnic champion. What’s worse is that some Umno leaders are echoing some of the same demands leading up to their party’s annual general assembly last week.

Instead of supporting the president’s efforts to promote liberalisation, Wanita Umno has submitted a memorandum calling for the Sedition Act not to be repealed. Resolutions have been submitted to discuss a broad range of issues including the status of vernacular schools and suggestions to strip off the citizenship of non-Malays who are not fluent in the Malay language.

The party leadership should take notice that international observers are going to follow the proceedings very closely. Umno is the most dominant ruling party in the country and the resolutions passed in the party’s annual general assembly are going to have a major impact on how the country is going to be run.

Of course, Umno delegates have the right to freedom of expression.

However, the party must be reminded of its obligations as a ruling party and the consequences of its speech especially those that are racially charged and sensitive. Instead of blaming the Chinese for the BN coalition electoral setback, the party should conduct a self-evaluation on what the party has done wrong in order to improve its electoral performance.

Any ruling parties that refused to admit their weaknesses after decades of being in power do not deserve to continue to be in power. Making the Chinese community as its main political punching bag is not going to prove that the community is the main cause of the Malays’ dilemmas and grievances.

If the attacks persist, it is going to show that Umno, as the most dominant Malay-based ruling party over the last five decades, has failed to deliver as the leader of the BN-led federal government. It controls the administration and its resources. It has been able to implement any affirmative policies that benefited the Malays without any resistance from its partners in BN.

Who is to be blamed if the Malays failed to improve their socio-economic standards and conditions? Should the Chinese undergraduates be penalised just because not enough Malay graduates qualified for exemption from repaying their PTPTN loan?    

Some Umno leaders have said that the Chinese voters are easily duped to support the opposition. A few even suggested that these voters are part of a conspiracy to bring down Umno. The only fault the Chinese voters have committed is to exercise their voting right to elect a democratic government.

All political parties that choose to participate in the electoral process must respect the decision of the voters.

Some segments of Umno, especially those who insisted on blaming other races and religions for their leadership failure, are the biggest threats to the BN coalition’s political future. It would be foolhardy for any ethnic minority parties to think that they can displace the majority Malay leadership.

Most of the non-Malay voters did not vote for the BN because they had demanded better responses from the ruling BN regime for their grievances and problems. 

In this regard, MCA and other Chinese-based parties must work together with the moderate and progressive leaders in Umno to restore the confidence of Chinese voters in BN. These parties do not have to respond in similar fashion by bashing up the instigators.

MCA, Gerakan, SUPP and LDP can reach out to the Malay community by assuring them that the Chinese community encourages them to succeed and to achieve greater heights. Tertiary institutions linked to the parties could provide full scholarships and bursaries to Malay students who obtained good academic results. Chinese-based companies could offer top Malay students to work for them as management trainees.

It is important to debunk the notion that the Chinese community is the main cause of the Malay community’s weaknesses and woes. We must make an impression that meritocracy is the only yardstick for success. Individuals regardless of race or creed are encouraged to achieve greater success and contribute positively to national development.  

BN is only viable if Umno can help to steer it towards the right direction. The right path is to stay progressive and inclusive. Umno must ensure that it does not push itself and the BN further away from the moderate middle ground. 

Khoo Kay Peng is a political analyst and a management consultant. He believes that this nation can only progress with the collective will of its people. - See more at: http://www.theantdaily.com/Main/Can-Umno-steer-BN-in-the-right-direction#sthash.4XIohkLB.dpuf

Khoo Kay Peng

Can single-stream schools fix knowledge, racial gap?

That's the problem with people in Malaysia., even the so-called experts. They always jump into deep end without first identifying the root or cause of the problem. In the end, issues are mixed up and they find themselves back in square one.

First things first. What is the basic function of schools? Many would think education. But in many countries, including Malaysia, schools are also a place of indoctrination. But the real function of schools should be learning. Kids attend school to learn and to learn how to learn.

Who caused these problems which beset our education system? It's the adults. The problem is not so much on the syllabus or system or streams, but in the people. The very fact that some of these people think that schools are the solution to their problems is enough to convince many that nothing will change at best, or decline further at worst.

Which is why, adults are the biggest hypocrites. They are so prejudiced in their thinking that instead of identifying the cause, they rather do the same thing over and over again expecting different results.

Let's take the popular view of using schools to foster unity among races for example. The root cause is the adults. But the treatment is administered to the kids? The logic escapes me.

It's the adults from different races who can't get along, not the kids. Shouldn't the adults be made to attend special "single-stream" adult-schools instead? Shouldn't the adults be made to attend those National Service Training Camps, starting with the politicians first of course. Isn't it the adults who are instilling the same prejudices into their kids? The truth is, no matter how well kids mix with each other, even if some of their best friends are from a different race, each will take a different path and lead a different life in adulthood. Because Malaysian society is structured as such.

Even in countries with a homogeneous society, they still kill each other because of religion. So, do we prescribe the same solution to them? Get their kids and parents to mix with each other to "unite" them?

In terms of learning, what is the correlation between with the number of streams and the quality of education? Does having a single stream make better students, improve their learning, and expand their knowledge? Does it translate to better schools with better facilities and better teachers?

The problem is with the quality of teachers and educators, the people in government implementing education policies, the people who designs the syllabus, the people in charge of education, from top to bottom. The problems are created by people, and there too lies the solution.

We often hear about comparisons between education systems and syllabus with those from other countries. But we seldom highlight or compare the quality and training of the teachers, educators and administrators.

Focus on getting better trained people in the public education service, keep politics out & religions at home, and the problems will disappear. Simple.

Or perhaps not so simple for some of those who get mental orgasms by the mere thought of abolishing Chinese Schools :)

---

Spotlight on education: Can single-stream schools fix knowledge, racial gap?

KUALA LUMPUR, Nov 12 — Malaysia’s continuing slide down the global education pole has again reignited the decades-old debate to dismantle vernacular schools entirely and enforce a single-stream system.

However, experts at an education forum last night remain split in their opinions that a one-stream school system can repair the growing racial gap they blame for the country’s mediocre assessment in knowledge rankings worldwide.

“There should not be one stream of schooling in Malaysia,” Wan Saiful Wan Jan, chief executive of think-tank Institute for Democracy and Economic Affairs, told the 30-odd people who turned up for the talk titled “Should there be one stream schooling in Malaysia?”

He said the current education system was a “centralised mess” dogged by illogical policies and politicians who wanted to stamp their mark but did not really consider the effect on the students who would have to go through the changes.

“I believe the schooling system must be decentralised and depoliticised to get more people involved to plan its future,” he said.

The analyst believed that for decentralisation to work, however, policy-makers must first grapple with the idea that individuals have the right to make their own choices.

He also argued that if schools were to be used as a medium to foster unity, then focus should be given on the quality of the education rather than forcing everyone to conform.

“If the schools have enough quality, then it doesn’t matter what syllabus nor language is being used,” Wan Saiful said.

Panellist Zul Fikri too shared the belief that race issues must be kept out of education policies, but disagreed that abolishing vernacular schools was a practical solution to improving the knowledge levels.

“What we are looking at is a predominantly heritage and culture issue and not education,” said the founder and chairman of Teach for the Needs, a non-governmental organisation that provides tuition classes for underprivileged students.

“We have to let go of some of our fear that we hold on to now. Don’t talk about race in education. It is the content that matters and how they (students) are educated,” he said and floated an idea for a hybrid schooling system to stimulate cultural diversity to promote racial unity.

Another panellist, Lim Teck Ghee who heads the Centre for Policy Initiatives, also noted that politicians have attempted to thwart the national education agenda with partisan issues, but said vernacular schools should be seen as protecting minority rights.

He pointed out the proposal to abolish Chinese schools nationwide mooted by a junior Umno politician last ahead of his Malay party’s annual general assembly, purportedly as the vernacular schools were hotbeds for racism and anti-establishment sentiments.

“These schools have become a convenient scapegoat, particularly for the Malay public,” Lim told the forum.

He said critics of vernacular education have also not produced any study as evidence to back their claims that Chinese or Indian schools cause disunity.

Lim said that out of the 356 Chinese schools in the country, 314 have non-Chinese students; he added that in some of them, as much as 70 per cent of the student population were of other races.

“It’s not the racial sentiment that’s involved, but the pedagogy factor. How can you ensure that these (vernacular) schools are on a level playing field with national schools?” he said.

He pointed out the unequal public funding of the different existing school streams, alleging that most of the money was being funnelled into Mara junior colleges to ensure the Bumiputera-exclusive schools had the best teachers and facilities.

“This is where the disparity is, where the government has built up an elitist Malay education system that is sacred from the national education stream,” he said.

The researcher said that at the same time, the federal government appeared to be rolling back in its own initiatives to enhance unity among schoolchildren of the different existing streams and cited as an example, the Pupils Integration Plan for Unity that began in 1986 when Tun Abdullah Ahmad Badawi helmed the Education Ministry and was revived again in 2005 when the latter was prime minister.

He noted that the budget for the programme that aimed to stimulate racial interaction between Malay Muslim students in homogenous institutions such as religious and national boarding schools, and other ethnicities, saw its budget slashed from Rm 25.4 million in 2007 to RM2.4 million in 2011.

Independent researcher Nor Arlene Tan Khalid concurred with Lim that national schools were “very Malay-centric” but said the indoctrination of a mono-culture plagues vernacular schools too.

She disclosed that she was a product of a Chinese-medium school where students were barred from conversing in any other dialect but Mandarin.

A policy that forced the students to conform to a certain identity was unhealthy as it chips away at the diversity of Malaysia’s rich ethnic culture without necessarily improving the country’s educational standards, she said.

“There should be a single stream that can accommodate everyone,” Nor Arlene said, making a case for single-stream schools but decentralising the system by granting autonomy to the schools.

“We should be addressing other core issues such as why aren’t our students scoring in the Pisa tests,” she said, referring to the Programme for International Student Assesment conducted by the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development which tests 15-year-olds on their reading, science and math-solving abilities.

Malaysian students scored in the bottom quarter in the last assessment in 2012 the results of which were released in April this year, limping home at 39th place out of 44 countries.
- See more at: http://www.themalaymailonline.com/malaysia/article/spotlight-on-education-can-single-stream-schools-fix-knowledge-racial-gap#sthash.repSeGMP.dpuf

High Pitched by NAMEWEE - 黃明志在中國【我是好聲音】飆高音

An outspoken & talented guy...enjoy!




another nice song of his...

Demographia: Malaysia’s residential housing market ‘severely unaffordable’

What this finding tells us is that there are more people who can't afford a home than those who can.

On one hand, many Malaysians, specifically those in urban areas and developed states, are facing great difficulty owning a home because they could not afford it. On the other, we have state and federal government who thinks that 400k is considered affordable. 10 years ago, 400k was considered expensive when the average prices were 180k to 250k. So, unless the average income have doubled since then, 400k is still not affordable to many. That is assuming that we take into account the price relative to the size.

To expect prices to fall to the level of a decade ago is unrealistic.

But that does not mean that the government cannot do more to alleviate the financial burden of the people.

For a start, they could make cars cheaper. With the reduced amount of car loans, the people will be able to afford higher loans for homes. Since they would probably be living further away from the city centre due to cheaper home prices, their transportation cost should be low for it to be practical.

Times have changed. Almost every household requires at least one car for work and leisure. The ridiculous car prices in Malaysia simply does not make sense. The government is impoverishing the people by taxing them on a depreciating asset instead of enriching them through home ownership. If the government wants to make up the loss of revenue from excise duties from cars, they can tax luxury cars more, or even raise the RPGT for properties priced above a certain amount, say, 500k.

---

Demographia: Malaysia’s residential housing market ‘severely unaffordable’

Saturday, 25 October 2014

WHEN middle income professionals are unable to afford their own home based on a single income and have to team up with either a spouse or another person to qualify for a mortgage loan, then it is a sign that the unaffordability of our housing market has become critical.

A finding by US-based urban development researcher Demographia reveals Malaysia’s residential housing market is “severely unaffordable”, even more out of reach than residents in Singapore, Japan and the United States.

Demographia’s finding, cited by Singapore’s Straits Times in a report on Oct 14, rates housing as severely unffordable if the median of house price to annual income is 5.1 times.

Malaysia clocked in at 5.5 times, showing many Malaysians continue to be locked out of the housing market, compared with Singapore’s 5.1 times, while the United States’ and Japan’s housing markets were found to be “moderately unaffordable”.

Public interest group, National House Buyers Association (HBA) honorary secretary-general Chang Kim Loong says Demographia’s report supports HBA’s own finding that house prices, especially in the urban and sub-urban areas, have risen beyond the reach of many average Malaysians.

“For the past few years, HBA has sounded the alarm on the risk of a “homeless generation” made up of a growing number of young Malaysians especially the lower and middle income groups who are unable to afford their own home. When this homeless group grows in number, it can give rise to many other social problems,” he warns.

Chang says when even middle income professionals are unable to afford their own home based on a single income, the situation has become critical.

He says unless one is willing to be tied down by a long-term or back-breaking mortgage or mortgages, the high residential prices have rendered buying a house an increasingly uphill task, if not an impossible feat for the many lower income and average Malaysians.

“The skyrocketed prices have driven house buyers to take back breaking mortgages and many needed to combine their income in order to qualify for a mortgage, thus leaving them with very little or no savings after paying the monthly instalments and other basic necessities.

“This will place families at risk as they could fall into a deficit situation if any sudden emergencies happen to either of the borrowers,” Chang says.

He points out the possibility that in the event these borrowers cannot afford to pay their instalments and the banks are forced to auction off their properties, “there is a risk of a property bubble bursting, just like what happened during the sub-prime financial crisis in the US.”

“The borrowers and their dependents will also be faced with financial and emotional crisis that befalls their foreclosed property. Foreclosures can devastate a family’s economic and social standing, leaving them poorer instead,” Chang laments.

Chang says just six years ago it was still possible for a single middle level manager earning RM5,000 a month to buy a new double-storey link house in Kajang for less than RM250,000, and for a single executive earning RM3,000 a month to buy a new condominium in the Old Klang Road area for about RM200,000.

“Today, a new house in Kajang are in excess of RM700,000 but a middle level manager is just earning RM6,000 or thereabout a month. Recent launches of condominiums around Old Klang Road area are in excess of RM600,000, while the average salaries of executives are still around RM3,500 a month,” he laments.

He believes the maximum price that households with an monthly income of RM10,000 should purchase is only RM360,000 (RM120,000 x 3x).

“HBA has always stressed that affordable housing should be priced around RM150,000 to RM300,000, and not more then RM400,000 even for prime locations. Given that annual household income uses the assumption of two working spouses, there is a critical need for properties priced at RM150,000 to cater to single families and adults.

“We urge the government to further lower the threshold of affordable house price to between RM150,000 and RM300,000, and not more than RM400,00 even for prime locations,” Chang adds.

Chang says these houses, with minimum built-up of 800 sq ft and three bedrooms, need not come with fanciful finishing, but have just the bare necessities for a family’s comfort.

Stemming the greed

Malaysian Institute of Estate Agents (MIEA) president Siva Shanker concurs that the unaffordability housing issue has become critical over the past three to four years due to the sharp upswing in house prices.

“It was driven by the low entry costs with schemes such as no need for downpayment, developer interest bearing schemes and free stamp duty and legal fees, Although the Government has introduced various cooling measures and more responsible bank lending guidelines which has brought down the number of housing transactions, prices or value of houses still remain high.

“The fact that salaries have not kept up with the upswing in property prices have further worsened the unaffordability situation,” Siva explains.

HBA’s Chang points out the risks posed by “Investors’ Clubs” or “Millionaires Clubs” which are basically syndicated speculators incorporated by some ingenious individuals.

“They work in cahoot with developers, valuers and banks. Speculative buyers may be caught by the latest round of cooling measures. How the situation will pan out will depend on the holding capability of these speculators of which most of them may not have. Come hand-over time when it is time for these “investors” to flip their purchases, there may be a shortage of buyers for these properties, most of which were transacted at inflated and not real market value prices,” he warns.

Siva opines that the imposition of real property gains tax (RPGT) to tax gains from property transactions should be counted from the date of completion of the property and not from the signing of the sale and purchase agreement as what is being practised now.

This is given that it takes three years for high-rise residences to be delivered to buyers upon the signing of the sale and purchase agreement, and two years for landed property. Chang says the severity of the housing crisis for many Malaysians today calls for a workable housing delivery model to be put into action urgently before the problem spills over and cause more social problems in the country.

Housing the people has to be made the top thrust of the government and all possible measures need to be put to work fast and bottlenecks must be promptly addressed.

He says much more can be done to ensure a sustainable and orderly housing market for the people, stressing that holistic and concerted efforts need to be adopted.

“However, very often policies adopted are more for political expediency rather than for the betterment of the people.

“We need a single umbrella to monitor, regulate and police the performance of the various agencies that are entrusted with the role to ensure affordable housing index are met and properly distributed to the deserving ones. They must build the right quantity of the right property, at the right location, for the right populace, and at the right price.

“There must be full transparency on the location, number of units, registration and balloting process to ensure fairness to all eligible buyers,” Chang stresses.

A single database will enable individuals to learn about the availability of the affordable housing in their communities or in the communities they planned to move to, and understand financing options avail to them.

Siva also calls for a central planning and delivery agency to plan and coordinate all the affordable housing needs of the people.

“The whole process should be totally transparent with a master registry to record all the database of applicants and successful candidates. There should also be a moratorium period of up to 10 years to ensure that the successful candidates offered these affordable housing will not be able to dispose these homes for quick profit.

“The federal and state governments should provide the land and other forms of incentives to encourage private developers to lend their support for these affordable housing schemes,” Siva says.

Chang agrees that giving incentives to developers that build affordable housing will motivate them to throw in their support to build more of such housing units, adding that building up the infrastructure connectivity to the still relatively undeveloped areas will make these places more accessible and improve demand for property in those places.

“HBA has proposed to the government to take the lead by unlocking more of its vast land banks to build affordable housing for the people.

“The reason why developers are not chipping in to build more affordable housing units is because of the so-called profit maximisation by industry players. It is either high-rise multiple hundred units or high-end luxury units. Very often it is a combination of both - luxurious high-end units.I have not heard of developers building single-storey terrace houses that were so prevalent in the past. Developers are refusing to build such price and low margin items and will rather focus on higher margin items. With land being a scarce resource, developers will maximise the value of their land banks.

“If the land comes from the federal and state governments, private developers will be more willing to throw in their support to develop affordable housing for those in need,” Chang concludes.

http://www.thestar.com.my/Business/Business-News/2014/10/25/A-house-too-far-Demographia-Malaysias-residential-housing-market-severely-unaffordable/?style=biz

---

Report shows Malaysian homes more unaffordable than in Singapore, Japan and the US

KUALA LUMPUR, Oct 13 — Malaysia has a “severely unaffordable” residential homes market, with housing even more out of reach for its residents than in Singapore, Japan and the United States, according to US-based urban development researcher Demographia.

Demographia’s report was cited today in a report in Singapore’s Straits Times newspaper to highlight how many Malaysians continue to be locked out of the residential housing market despite the federal government’s attempt at helping first-time house buyers.

According to the ST report, Demographia rates housing as severely unaffordable if it is 5.1 times median annual income. Malaysia clocks in at 5.5x, higher than Singapore’s 5.1x, while housing in the United States and Japan is “moderately unaffordable”.

- See more at: http://www.themalaymailonline.com/malaysia/article/report-shows-malaysian-homes-more-unaffordable-than-in-singapore-japan-and#sthash.kgmX5N0H.dpuf

MH-17: The Untold Story

It's refreshing to find something that is based on logic and reality in these insane times.

For many Malaysians, I doubt they realise that someone hijacked their plane, a foreign military shot down another, and a group of armed foreigners even invaded one of their state in recent times. In some countries, it would have been viewed as acts of war.

Instead, it seems like many Malaysians are convinced that Chinese Schools are the bigger threat, which they insist are run by extremist immigrant teachers and headmasters, producing extremists immigrant students produced by extremist immigrant parents who work as coolies and prostitutes... :)

sometimes, don't you just love the logic of some of these people?

well, after more than half a century that these schools have been in existence, I wonder how many planes did these Chinese-schooled extremist students managed to take down? or how many states  they've managed to invade with their formidable Chinese-speaking army?

Seriously though.... RT managed to produce an interesting documentary. It's a worthwhile watch.

Welcome back to reality....

Imagine there is no NEP

The NEP brought good as well as bad. But all in all, given the circumstances, it was not a complete success, nor was it a complete failure either. The question is whether the NEP is sustainable in it's current form. Any affirmative action requires substantial resources from the government, country and society.

Again, the fundamental enabler rests on the economy and the wealth of the country. In Malaysia, the government can give preferential treatment to the Malays in education, business, jobs, housing, etc. To do that, the government will need to increase taxes, cut subsidies, and of course use the income from resources such as oil. Whether we'd like to admit it or not, these come at the expense of Non-Malays and the country's resources. The reality is, we have managed to come this far because of oil revenue. But as the population increases, logically, so will the amount needed to run the country.

We are already seeing the symptoms in the form of limited places in universities, inadequate schools, hospitals, bad maintenance of public amenities and infrastructure like roads, parks, water, fuel, etc.

Malaysians will need to somehow come to terms with reality. When the people are fighting to get their hands on their share of the pie, conflicts are unavoidable. But humans by nature are prone to be selfish and greedy. Politicians want to grab as much power as possible. Businesses want as much profit as possible. Employees want as much salary as possible.

Regardless of the policies or solutions, somebody has to carry it out. It's those who are responsible for implementing them that matters. Do we have the right people for the job? Does society itself possess the right mentality and values?

NEP would still have happen one way or another.

Any suggestions for an alternative form or modification to the existing NEP is akin to abolishing it. The alternative must be in place first before attempting to modify or change the existing NEP itself.

NEP or not, it will be up to the beneficiaries, which are the Malays themselves. Whether the Non-Malays can live with this will depend on themselves. Even if the government abolishes NEP tomorrow, do the non-Malays naively expect things to be completely different without the cooperation and acceptance from the Malay community?

Just as the non-Malay's contribution to the economy have benefited and helped uplift the country and the Malays, the non-Malays too will benefit from the progression and development of the Malays. Malaysian society is actually more inter-connected than many care to admit. Like a house of cards, when one falls, the rest will follow.

Today, the Malays make up a big segment of the educated, professionals, middle-class and entrepreneurs. Just like everyone else, they too want the country to progress and move forward. But without trust, it will not happen.

As long as each community knows which lines should not be crossed, trust can be nurtured, and good things will happen. And with a needs-based social safety net in place, distrust and insecurities will be eliminated. However, at the individual level, we can always choose to forge ahead instead of waiting.

At the end of the day, it's has always been hoping for the best and preparing for the worst.

---

Imagine there is no NEP

Wong Chin Huat

Published: 23 October 2014

For many members of ethnic minorities, if there is no New Economic Policy (NEP), then all the people will be living in peace.

The reality is more complicated than this. Doing the NEP may just do away state partiality, but not socio-economic inequality. And we need an alternative to do away both.

What’s wrong with the NEP?

Many people like to argue that the design of the NEP was good, only its implementation was bad. I respectfully disagree.

For me, the intention of many – but definitely not all – to have and support the NEP was good, but its design and its implementation were flawed.

The road to hell is paved with good intentions, if you like.

So, what’s wrong with the NEP? The NEP was flawed in three ways.

Flaw 1: statist assumption

First, like all statist projects, the NEP was based on the assumption the state was benevolent and selfless, and had no mechanism to check the “agency problem” of its executors.

The very core idea of the NEP, which was firmly planted in 1946 and lives on after its technical conclusion in 1990, was that state partiality can check the excess of socio-economic inequality. Unfortunately, even in pragmatic sense, two wrongs don’t make a right.

Prime Minister Datuk Seri Najib Razak just claimed that Bumiputeras only effectively controlled 10% of corporate share.

And according to Dr Muhammed Abdul Khalid in a 2002 article titled “Anti-poverty plans are colour-blind”, the poverty rate for the Bumiputera was 5.3% as compared with that of only 0.6% for the Chinese.

Even when comparing the bottom 10% of each ethnic group, the Malays’ average household income was only about 70% of that of the Chinese.

The simple question to ask: how can the powerful NEP state fail to help the Malays, both in building a competent and self-reliant capitalist class and lifting the Malays out of poverty after 45 years?

Has the state done all it can? Or does it fail because it has not extracted more from the minorities or hold them back enough? Or is the failure caused by some sabotages by the evil Jews and the evil Americans?

The more convincing answer to me is misplaced incentives.

First, economically, the uncompetitive nature of Umno’s electoral one-party state allows the ethnic champions and guardians to steal what they are supposed to protect. If you can only count on me to advance your interests, what don’t I take a cut?

Second, politically and most detrimentally, the economic independence of Malays will gradually eliminate the political dependence of Umno.

Think of it this way: if ghosts are forever gone, ghost-busters will be out of job.

Similarly, if a cat is kept fundamentally to catch mice, then the cat must be able to catch enough mice to impress the masters. However, if the cat eliminates the mice population, it will be the victim of its own success. As its usefulness end, all its mistakes and nuisances may become intolerable.

Flaw 2: mono-ethnic support

The second flaw of the NEP is that it has no real cross-ethnic support. In the aftermath of May 13, the non-Bumiputeras basically swallowed the NEP down the throat as the price to restore peace and avoid more ethnic violence.

Even when the economy is good, the minorities support for the NEP and its successor policies is at best lukewarm and half-hearted. Unable to overthrow the policy, the minorities skirt around it with schemes like Ali Baba partnership.

Those who feel strongly alienated respond with brain drain, capital flight or supporting the opposition. Some even privately discriminate against or belittle the ethnic majority as an everyday form of resistance.

This frustrates both the state and the Malays, which respond with more discriminative policies against the minorities. Malaysians are like crabs in a basket – trying hard to pull each other down from climbing out of it.

It’s unfair to blame the NEP’s mono-ethnic support base solely or mainly on the state or the ethnic majority. It’s our collective karma, going all the way back to our failure to build a really inclusive notion of nationhood after decolonisation.

But the harsh reality remains: an economic problem cannot be resolved with authoritarian political means.

Flaw 3: violence as the guarantor

The third flaw of the NEP has got everything to do with its origin: the May 13, 1969 riot. It was installed with violence and any attempt to remove it even through democratic means is responded with threat of violence.

With Bumiputeras constituting a majority in some three quarters of parliamentary constituencies, there is no way the NEP can be removed without substantial support of the ethnic majority.

Yet, defenders of the NEP like Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad object vehemently to the proposed repeal of the Sedition Act which, in practice, shelves the NEP from public debate and its replacement by other laws.

When violence is used as the ultimate backer of a policy in the “or else” way, not only its flaws and weaknesses – as the two flaws of NEP discussed above – cannot be addressed, society gets addicted to violence as a means to curb dissent and suppress difference.

Any surprise that now to “protect” the Muslims from dogs, a man’s life is threatened?

Alternative to NEP – non-statist, non-ethnic, non-violent

The NEP policy paradigm is flawed but it would be wrong to think that Malaysia without the NEP and all its flaws would be a bed of roses.

American President Theodore Roosevelt said it aptly: “this country will not be a good place for any of us to live in unless we make it a good place for all of us to live in.”

It’s true for any country in the world, more so for multicultural societies, where socio-economic inequality often correlates with some cultural divides, hence capable of turning class tension into communal conflicts.

It’s time that Malaysians to think of an alternative to the NEP. To not repeat the latter’s flaws, the new policy paradigm must have at least these three characteristics.

First, it should be non-statist by large, building the incentives into market and society to eradicate poverty and restructure society.

A rigidly stratified society, whether between or within ethnic groups, means restricted social upwards mobility for individuals trapped at the bottom. It’s not just injustice but also losses to society and economy when talents cannot be tapped optimally.

However, for a society to stay harmonious and economy to stay stable, it requires also solidarity for the least endowed to have a decent life.

Dog-eats-dog competition is not only inhumane but may eventually tear apart the social fabric in a multicultural setting.

This leads to the second point, the agenda must be national, and not communal. Socio-economic empowerment should be seen as a right and part of what the Malaysian citizenship entails, rather than a privilege based on group membership.

This will deprive any political entrepreneurs from holding any community at ransom for the empowerment that is rightly theirs.

This means a fundamental paradigm shift from “entitlement” – who our ancestors were and when they came here – to “empowerment” – where we are and where we want to go to actualise our life.

For this to work, we will need a national consensus that covers also the aspect of cultural identity. We will need to confront honestly the 1946 question, seek a real consensus and make peace.

Third, the new policy paradigm must be based on reason, the opposite of violence. This would allow all its flaws and weaknesses to be scrutinised and corrected.

Is this new paradigm possible? Allow me to paraphrase John Lennon:

“You may say I'm a dreamer
But I'm not the only one
I hope someday you'll join us
And the country will live as one.”

- See more at: http://www.themalaysianinsider.com/opinion/wong-chin-huat/article/imagine-there-is-no-nep#sthash.MYjHKRQZ.dpuf

Many Malaysians Can't Afford To Retire

Unlike nonsensical and unproductive issues raised by some politicians, this is something which will have a direct bearing on our lives. Retirement. It's not something many think about when they are young, and even those not so young in their mid-lives. Unless one has substantial wealth, one will probably have to work well into their old age.

Many youngsters start out in life full of optimism of striking it rich and retire young. Not many succeed. The question is, how many are prepared to work (as in earning a living) until they die? Not many. In our modern materialistic society most will try their best to accumulate as much wealth as they can because they want to retain their current lifestyles in their retirement age. Again many will fail.

A few prerequisites to be able to retire:

• must be debt-free
• must have a home to stay without paying
• 2/3 of current salary per month for expenses
• or minimum RM1000 to RM2000 per month for basic living expenses
• must have substantial savings for medical expenses or emergencies
• preferable without dependants.

From the time a person starts out in life, he will have 30 years to plan. Looks like plenty of time, but it's really not. In the 30 years, he will need to deal with inflation, rising cost of living and expenses, marriage, kids, education, cars, house, insurance, etc. Many in their 40s, 50s or 60s today realise that they could not afford to retire. Many of the young generation today will find themselves in the same situation in the future.

Rather than hoping, it will be wiser to prepare ourselves mentally & physically to continue working into our old age. If you managed to retire early and comfortably, then great. If not, well, at least you're prepared.

Personally, I feel it is perfectly fine to continue working as long as health permits. Given a choice, I'd choose good health anyday! 

---

KUALA LUMPUR, Oct 5 ― Malaysia may be headed for a retirement crisis as tens of thousands of Malaysians depart the workforce for their golden years with less savings than is needed to keep them out of poverty.

According to recent figures from the Employees Provident Fund (EPF), the approximately 70,000 active 54-year-old contributors have an average savings of just under RM167,000 last year. The recommended minimum savings level is RM196,800.

The situation is made more alarming by the revelation that 69 per cent of all EPF contributors of the same age have less than RM50,000 in their accounts, as made known by the fund’s chief executive, Datuk Shahril Ridza Ridzuan, last month.

But even RM167,000 is scant consolation. As the average Malaysian expected to live until 75, retiring at 60 with that amount would mean surviving on just RM700 a month for the rest of their days.

With that amount, retirees would technically slip below the RM830 per month threshold that is indicative of poverty conditions in peninsular Malaysia, based on the Statistics Department’s poverty line income (PLI) for 2012.

According to Harveston Wealth Management financial adviser Annie Hor, a nest egg of RM167,000 could be made to last, but only if the retiree is completely free of debt and need not pay for accommodation.

“Otherwise you would be suffering a bit because if you just want a simple life, with three meals a day, maybe just get from point A to point B, petrol, you would need at least RM1,000 to 2,000 per month because, not forgetting when you are older, medical bills are expensive,” she told Malay Mail Online recently.

She added that her 60-year-old mother needs at least RM2,000 to get by in the city, even with her simple lifestyle.....

- See more at: http://www.themalaymailonline.com/malaysia/article/retirement-crisis-brewing-as-epf-savings-suggest-pensioner-poverty#sthash.cddlvIMN.dpuf

Pendatang = Chinese

The flavour of the month of October seems to be the term "pendatang" or immigrant. Of course, in Malaysia, it is usually used to refer to non-Malays, specifically the Chinese. I don't know why they reserve this term for the Chinese because many others including many Malays arrived here only a few of generations ago. Does that mean the Chinese have just fallen from 2nd class to immigrant class? or is this a promotion instead? hehehe.

This time round, it's this guy's turn: Chinese still act like ‘pendatang’...

Zainuddin Maidin

We can quote history, argue, and debate till the cows come home as to who came first, and who did what, but the conclusion will always be the same unless you are specific. Firstly, we need to agree on the cut off date as to the point in time our first ancestors arrive in this land. Secondly, we need to be precise in the use of the term itself.

Actually, he is telling the Chinese to assimilate and become a Malay... like him.

Zainuddin Maidin says:

1. “Why do they get so angry when they are called ‘pendatang’ when they themselves have preferred self isolation?” 

- Perhaps it's the same reason why some Indian Muslims get angry when they are called "mamak" and insists that they are categorised as Malays & Bumiputeras. And why are some Malays also get so defendsive when they are also called "pendatang" when they are clearly not? Some people are just sensitive beings.

Do the Chinese Malaysians today isolate themselves? It is nearly impossible to do that because the country is run by Malays. No matter how hard they try, the Chinese will still have to interact with Malays, beginning from the time they are born when their parents have to register their birth certificate with the Malay officer on duty. Or did he mean that the Chinese should live amongst the Malays. Perhaps in Kampung Baru? hehehe. Of course everyone knows the reason why that is not possible. So, who is isolating who again? Perhaps he was referring to their ancestors who rarely interacted with the locals....

2. refusal to learn Bahasa Malaysia

- Actually he is not entirely incorrect on this one. There are indeed some Chinese who absolutely hates Bahasa Melayu. But for the others, they could not possibly escape from learning Bahasa Melayu when it is taught not only in National Schools but also Vernacular Schools? Many may have a poor command of the language, but they are certainly not Bahasa Melayu illiterate. Well, unless he was referring to their ancestors, many of whom were indeed BM illiterate....

It is indeed advisable for the Chinese to really make an effort to improve their Bahasa Melayu. It is the national language after all. Having a good command of BM is not only an essential and beneficial skill, it also allows you to interact better with the Malays. Just as you would interact differently between say, a Japanese, or a Korean, or an Englishman, language plays a big role in building bridges. Don't let pride become a barrier.

3. Chinese in Malaysia still do not have a Malaysian identity

- This is a tricky one, because the last time I checked, nobody has come up an official definition on this Malaysian Identity. I would certainly like to know what this Malaysian Identity that he speaks of looks like. Or perhaps he was referring to Malay identity? Well, technically, the Chinese would need to become Muslims first. Unless, again, he was referring to their ancestors who really did came here with their Chinese customs...

4. Who is building walls and insisting on preserving their ‘pendatang’ identity

- Again, what does a "pendatang" identity look like? or does he mean Chinese identity. Why insist on referring Chinese identity to immigrant identity? Do those who come from other countries also share this Chinese identity?

Anyway, it's kinda hard to give up Chinese New Year and other festivals, mooncakes, ang pows, religious rituals, religion, etc. Firecrackers are an exception though because it looks like the Malays and Indians have taken over the monopoly of setting them off in the middle of the night. hahahah...

Anyway, "Pendatang" simply means immigrant. Technically, most Malaysians are not immigrants because they are born here. Some of their ancestors were more recent immigrants, some came earlier. So, he should have used the term "keturunan pendatang" which means "descendants of immigrants". That way, although some Chinese still won't like it, but at least they have no reason to deny it either. And those Chinese whose ancestors were here before his ancestors would not feel offended.

We do not need to be ashamed about our history. We must remember that it is not easy for a person to leave their place of birth, their home, to start a new life in a foreign land. In unfamiliar surroundings, sometimes even hostile, they had to work hard and sacrificed a lot for their descendants and their new home.

Perhaps everyone should just stop insulting each other's ancestors.
 

As we walk, all of our ancestors walk with us...